Biography assessment criteria indicators

By Ismael Rafols

Indicators of interdisciplinarity are increasingly requested. Yet efforts to make aggregate indicators have repeatedly failed due to the diversity and ambiguity of understandings of the notion of interdisciplinarity. What if, instead of universal indicators, a contextualised process of indicating interdisciplinarity was used?

In this blog post I briefly explore the failure of attempts to identify universal indicators and the importance of moving from indicatORS to indicatING. By this I mean: An assessment of specific interdisciplinary projects or programs for indicating where and how interdisciplinarity develops as a process, given the particular understandings relevant for the specific policy goals.

This reflects the notion of directionality in research and innovation, which is gaining hold in policy. Namely, in order to evaluate research, analyses need go beyond quantity (scalars: unidimensional indicators) and to take into account the orientations of the research contents (vectors: indicatING).

The failure of universal indicators of interdiscipli

ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CRITERIA AND EFFICIENCY INDICATORS

Caldwell, M. E. (1992). Quality in Higher Education: A Theoretical Study. Educational Research Journal, 7, 50–59 (eng).

Church, C. H. (1988). The qualities of validation. Studies in Higher Education, 13, 27–43 (eng).

Crozier, F., et al. (2006). Terminology of quality assurance: towards shared European values? Helsinki, Finland: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (eng).

Gover, A., Loukkola, T. (2015). EUREQA moments! Top tips for internal quality assurance. European University Association. Retrieved from www.eua.be (eng).

Decision on Criteria for Accreditation of Higher Education Institutions in Bosnia and

Herzegovina (2010). Official Gazette of BiH, 75/10 and 44/13. Retrieved from http:// hea.gov.ba/Dokumenti/u-pripremi/Criteria%20eng.pdf (eng).

ENQA Agency review: Agency for development of higher education and quality assurance of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HEA) (2017). Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/HEA-ERR_FINAL.pdf (eng).

European Commis

2022 CFLGA - Assessment Criteria (Indicators and MOVs) PDF

100%(1)100% encontró este documento útil (1 voto)
90 vistas

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Descargue como PDF o lea en línea desde Scribd
100%(1)100% encontró este documento útil (1 voto)
90 vistas37 páginas

Título original

2022 CFLGA_Assessment Criteria (Indicators and MOVs) (1).pdf

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

PDF o lea en línea desde Scribd

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Descargue como PDF o lea en línea desde Scribd
100%(1)100% encontró este documento útil (1 voto)
90 vistas37 páginas

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Descargue como PDF o lea en línea desde Scribd

También podría gustarte

    Menú del pie de página

    Ayuda

    Legal

    Social

    Obtén nuestras aplicaciones gratuitas

    Obtén nuestras aplicaciones gratuitas

    Copyright ©axisthaw.pages.dev 2025